Some people believe that in all level of education from primary school to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and are not enough one learning practice practice skill. Do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary era, people believe that from primary school to higher education, media, Sufi times were spent on teaching facts and a little emphasis is giving on experimental knowledge. This essay will discuss my agreement with the reason in subsequent paragraphs.
To commence with, educational institutions focused on only result, oriented education rather than the knowledge. In other words, schools and universities are competing each other for hundred percentage result, Su, many of them forget about the life and future of the children and how rigourous the situation was when moving to a job. For instance, a student who have 96 percentage score in his academic level failed to perform when it came to job level, they became tranquil and felt that it dreadful situation.
Further more, occasional bodies are not revising their syllabus. To expound, in India, meaning of educational institutions and universities. Army queues of same syllabus for about 10 to 20 years without revising it., Which require a lot of skills and training and also maintenance of practical app is too much expensive. Taking all these things in account. Do you have a propensity to do the same thing throughout the year. To exemplify, a recent study is done by Indian educational Society about 10 percentage of educational boards I supposed to change the syllabus and the government provide funds for training facilities. thus, the aforementioned reason substantiate how changing in curriculum affecting the education
To recapitulate, this essay clearly discussed that more weightage is have been given to theoretical facts rather than practical knowledge. I completely agree with the statement it subject. Had a combination of both practical and theoretical skills would be needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | Aswathipradeep | 95 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...iversities are competing each other for hundred percentage result, Su, many of them for...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... provide funds for training facilities. thus, the aforementioned reason substantiate...
^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...learly discussed that more weightage is have been given to theoretical facts rather ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'subjects'?
Suggestion: subjects
... completely agree with the statement it subject. Had a combination of both practical an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, for instance, i suppose, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38709677419 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01190454157 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5321688207 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224931669141 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619633336116 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047135655036 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116415242702 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029182375972 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.