The table below shows the partition of people over 15 in selected sports and physical recreation activities by gender in Australia during the period 2011-12. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the proportions of participants aged over 15 in 11 categories of selected sports and physical recreations by gender, during the period 2011-12 in Australia.
Overall, there are some considerable variances in the involvement of males and females in the selection of exercises.
As can be seen from the table, walking has the highest number of participation which is 46,9%, including 16,5% and 30,4% from men and women respectively, nearly twice as many women participants as men. Followed by fitness/gym with the figure being significantly lower (34,2%), approximately 12,7%, similarly, it has higher involvement of females (19,1%) than males (15,1%). According to the total numbers of participants in the selected list, it is clear that females engage in more than males with the figures being 79,4% and 77,6% respectively, at around 1,8%.
Interestingly, it is represented that men joined the majority of activities except for netball and yoga, whereas for women which is golf, football and basketball. Therefore, females tend to be interested to engage in those physical recreations more. As a result, proportionally, males were more likely to take part in sporting activities. For instance, in term of cycling/BMXing, the number of men (9,8%) is substantially higher than women (5,4%), which is nearly double.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, therefore, whereas, as for, except for, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44230769231 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21447355514 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.792458756 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166398132139 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767937900649 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122991693338 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143889575321 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158921695633 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.