Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weakness. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
Males and females are popularly claimed that they have different advantages and disadvantages. Some people believed that our society should discriminate men and women in particular jobs because they have not the same gender. In my personal view, both of males and females need to be treated equally. This essay will analytical my own view and give evidence for it.
First of all, it is undenied that men are able to do lots of works revelent to physical mental so they can apply for jobs such as constructor worker, police, safeguard, soldier, pilot…. On the other hand, women’s jobs usually are nursing, nanny, office-worker, beautician… because almost women are already having take-care skill and All the jobs which do not require a lot of energy are pretty suitable for females. For instance, in my hometown when I want to get some advice for my future jobs, all things that I can receive is I should become professions in jobs females should be.
However, for me, jobs should be optional for everyone. For example, if a man who has passionate to become a beautician, they will be allowed to work as a beautician in near future. The same situation for women, if they want to become a police and able to do it, they should be admission to follow this job. Such as me, I always have a dream that becomes a pilot as travelling and discover new countries is my biggest goal, although my mom always said to me that it does not fit for me.
To sum up, jobs should be free for all humans and we should not discriminate anybody because of the sex, gender quality need to be appeared everywhrere, everytime and in all cases.
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weakness Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 78
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the reults of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...olice and able to do it, they should be admission to follow this job. Such as me, I alway...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in particular, such as, first of all, in all cases, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64771003725 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5705661306 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121151937588 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585446019257 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623810033494 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090777025134 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728958811131 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.