The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010
The line graph compares four different areas regarding metric tonnes of carbon dioxide that a person released during a period of 35 years, commencing from 1975.
In general, there was an upward tendency in the amount of CO2 emitted in China, Thailand and Vietnam, while the opposite was true to Singapore. In addition, Singapore predominated as the country has the highest level of CO2 during the period shown and Vietnam remained the lowest position over the same period.
Although sharing the same starting point at 0.5 in 1975, Vietnam stabilized over the first 20 years before increasing marginally to approximately 2 in the final year, while Thailand experienced a considerable rise by 4 at the end of the period. Similarly, the level of carbon dioxide emissions in China commenced at 1 in the initial year, followed by a significant growth to a high of 2 in 1995. Subsequently, this category saw a slight decrease in numbers before reclaiming its second range and reaching over 5 in 2010
On the other hand, a more volatile pattern was observed in Singapore's carbon dioxide production. Beginning at 11 in 1975, which was much higher than the other three countries, the amount of CO2 released by Singapore fluctuated dramatically and peaked at 15 in 1975. Thereafter, it plummeted by half in 2005 before bouncing back to its starting point in the last year
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity of Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish in a city of Japa between 1980 and 2015 87
- Internet users as percentage of population 78
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 84
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity in Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96943231441 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83768885238 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602620087336 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1574429965 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168133715447 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702442801316 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730122319726 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107587438496 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768483943033 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.