Some people believe that the responsibility to prevent global environmental damage is on politicians while others think it is the responsibility of individuals. Discuss both viewpoints and give your opinion?
With the ever growing population, the environment has been constantly desecrated by the ongoing human activities, thus a section of society deems that it is the duty of the representatives to safeguard the ecosystem in order to obstruct the destruction worldwide whilst others believe that citizens are responsible for it. I, hereby partially agree with the given notion and will intently explore both the aspects in the upcoming paragraphs before reaching the final verdict.
To commence with, public servants have the power to create and enforce regulations and policies that can have a significant impact on environmental protection. To substantiate it further, they can establish laws that limit emissions, promote renewable energy, and control industrial practices that harm the environment. Apart from this, lawmakers participate in international agreements such as the Paris Agreement, where they make commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change on a global scale. Furthermore, government run agencies control funding for environmental research, conservation efforts, and sustainable infrastructure. They can allocate such resources to support initiatives that benefit the environment. For instance, the European Union's efforts to combat climate change include policies such as the Green Deal, which aims to make Europe the world's first climate-neutral continent by 2050.
On the contrary, individual consumption patterns directly affect demand for goods and services, which can drive environmentally damaging practices. Therefore, by choosing sustainable products and supporting eco-friendly companies, people can influence market dynamics. Moreover, masses can adopt more environmentally friendly behaviors in their daily lives, such as reducing energy consumption, conserving water, using public transportation, and practicing waste reduction. In addition to it, the combined efforts of the citizens can create a groundswell (growth of a strong feeling) of demand for sustainable practices, which can pressure businesses and governments to prioritize environmental concerns.
To conclude, I aver that though political leaders can enact laws and launch programs to enhance public awareness. Yet, the outcome of eco-friendly alternatives will not be effective without the participation of every single person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-18 | kuldip.kumar@hotmail.com | 89 | view |
- In some parts of the world traditional festivals and celebrations have disappeared or are disappearing What problems is this causing What measures could be taken to counter this situation 11
- You have just read an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centers in your country all look very similar to each other You don t fully agree with this opinion Write a letter to the editor of the newspaper In your letter say which points 89
- Describe a time when you made a change in your life You should talk about what change you made how you made it the reaction of others to it And whether you now think it was a good or bad decision 11
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Some people believe that the responsibility to prevent global environmental damage is on politicians while others think it is the responsibility of individuals Discuss both viewpoints and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e infrastructure. They can allocate such resources to support initiatives that be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07807807808 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.285954991 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663663663664 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8368571139 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.571428571 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0952507972076 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301327658104 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261360082849 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049429269182 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317434815614 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.28 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.56 8.58950901804 135% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.