Just like the government spends funds on music and theatre, it does the same on arts too which is considered a waste of money. Don’t you think that the government should spend more on revamping public services? Do you agree? If not, then why?
Nowadays, people contend that a large portion of government funding for performing arts, namely music and theater, is akin to spending on the arts when it should instead be applied to improving the services provided to people. However, I believe that art should be regarded as a fundamental component of society because it allows artists to express their creative side while also preserving the culture and history of the country.
First, creative people employ their talents to adorn a straightforward item that can transform a sparse space. Paintings, sculptures, and sketches add attractiveness to the environment, which improves many people’s dispositions and behaviors. They have significantly aided in the restoration of the ancient artwork and forefathers’ history. In addition, there are some people who have a strong desire to travel to museums and art galleries in order to admire the magnificent artistic creations that are frequently supported by governmental bodies.
There are a number of other advantages to supporting the fine arts since it provides young people with a similar passion with a great opportunity to succeed in this sector and make a fortune for themselves. Some youngsters who lack academic talent nevertheless find comfort and calm in working their magic on canvases. Furthermore, this sport has been accepted as a recreational activity for people who are battling with their mental health in many states. Indulging in these activities while getting a break from their monotonous routine is something that many adults like doing on the weekends.
In conclusion, the higher authorities should support public services and other initiatives with the same zeal and investment.
- Just like the government spends funds on music and theatre it does the same on arts too which is considered a waste of money Don t you think that the government should spend more on revamping public services Do you agree If not then why 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48301886792 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03391063506 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645283018868 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3118177249 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.090909091 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113167143736 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389063075921 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535043241752 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758373418044 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539282736733 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.