The pie chart below shows the worldwide distribution of private insurance policies.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of armed robberies, assaults and murders committed in London from 2003 to 2012.
It is clear that the figures for armed robberies followed a volatile pattern and decreased significantly, whereas assaults happened moderately more over time and the number of murders remained relatively the same. Overall, a much larger number of armed robberies and assaults occurred than murders.
In 2003, armed robbery was the most common criminal activity with nearly 3,500 cases. Assaults and murders were committed fewer at roughly 2,400 and 500 times respectively. By 2008, armed robbery’s figures plunged dramatically to about 1,000 after a slight growth in 2004, overtaken by the number of assaults, which was just above 2,000 despite several fluctuations. The figures for murders gradually fell back to precisely 500 after a marked increase between 2004 and 2006.
In 2012, the number of assaults experienced an upward trend, peaking at approximately 2,800. Armed robbery’s figures recovered at about 1,500 as the second highest number in 2009, and stayed relatively stable for the rest of the period. There was a noticeably short-lived growth in the number of murders by 2010 before it fell back to just above 500 at the end.
- The pie chart below shows the worldwide distribution of private insurance policies The table shows the private insurance policy ownership of three countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 11
- The pie chart below shows the worldwide distribution of private insurance policies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3184079602 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73046864536 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9586169027 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.