In many countries, people are spending more hours at their workplace. Why is that? Is that a negative or positive development?
Recent decades have witnessed the proliferation of prices so the employees have to devote almost time to their workloads in order to cover the basic necessities. In this essay, I will discuss some specific causes of this phenomenon and why I believe that this situation is negative development.
On the one hand, there are several rationales which lead people spend almost time for working. One of the discernible reasons is the promotion prospects. Indeed, when people devote their personal time to working, they can enhance their working performance, which can facilitate the ambitious employees will promote to a higher position in the company. Another benefit is the increase of the income. Undoubtedly, with the inflation effects, the consumer products is exorbitant, which will push individuals working around the clock to make sufficient money to manage the basic essentials.
On the other hand, it is true that the situation is detrimental development. One of the most crucial explanations is individuals can have several health conditions. Indeed, If individuals devote all their time face to computer screen, the staff can be physically and mentally exhaustion, which rise higher possibility of suffering from health conditions. Another one is causing intensive distance between each family member. Indubitably, by staying too much on the companies, parents can have limited time for their older generation and children. Consequently, the family circle cannot tighten and children can be negatively effect at the formative years.
In conclusion, I believe that adults spending most of their time on companies because of the promotion purposes and earn money for specific needs and I reaffirm that the phenomenon is negative development because this situation can cause some health conditions in individuals and prevent them from spending time with their families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
- The graphs show the changes in the UK industry steel between 1970 and 2000 million tonnes vs thousand 73
- People are living longer after they retire What are the problems What can be done to solve these problems 73
- Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media Do you agree with this view or do you think that in some circumstances government should limit the freed 77
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 69
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...o their workloads in order to cover the basic necessities. In this essay, I will discuss some spe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50173010381 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92350891419 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543252595156 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4249929645 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148438370675 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429684896656 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476220966969 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934257505478 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331143341359 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...o their workloads in order to cover the basic necessities. In this essay, I will discuss some spe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50173010381 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92350891419 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543252595156 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4249929645 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148438370675 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429684896656 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476220966969 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934257505478 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331143341359 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.