You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words
The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The diagram gives information about the rate of pupils who calculated the high score for separate factors at one university during the years 2000, 2005, and 2010. Overall, electronic resources surged dramatically; meanwhile, a substantial decrease in the range of modules offered occurred in these years.
On the one hand, the percentage of learners who rated high points for electronic resources was approximately 45% in 2000, and then it soared sharply up to 72% and 88% in 2005 and 2010, respectively. Besides that, teaching quality was also one of the factors, which was well-responsed by students, increasing from 65% to 69% in 2000 and 2010 accordingly.
On the other hand, some categories, like buildings/teaching facilities, and print resources, maintained stability for good ratings during the three years; even if the rate of the students changed, it only fluctuated 1% to 2% slightly. The range of modules offered changed during these years of surveys. In 2000, the rate of students for the factor was very low at only about 32%; however, by 2005 and 2010, this declined more steeply by about 30% to 27%, respectively.
In conclusion, the university needs to maintain its advantages, which its learners highly value. Moreover, given the factors for which pupils voted negative points, the school should research the reasons why students gave negative responses in these categories and plan the new methods to improve the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-02 | Awadhesh Mourya | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should wr 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative develop ment 56
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should wr 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.265625 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91710841149 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6015625 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1767578818 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.8 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142242539309 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543293164401 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057566536487 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747052322298 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320721493646 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.