Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The present is incumbent on the past. The past of an individual has significant influence on the decisions we make today. Though in order to base the present judgement on the past, one has to determine certain connections between the events. Sometimes the connections take time to manifest yet most of the times the connections are easily deduced. Perhaps even subconsciously. Hence i agree that the past can assist people in making important decisions today.
Firstly the author's reason that no connection can be made between past and current events instantly is not always true....
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct. Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans general 88
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future. 80
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 70
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 98
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your 80
Comments
Everything looks good, but
Everything looks good, but you could have used more concrete exaple in first paragraph, as you did for 2nd para, anyway overall doesn't matter
In 3rd para use of word Adepts appears out of context, apepts is skilful, expert ie an adjective or noun. but the way you used is as verb
I think you could score above 5
i cudn't come up wid ny othr
i cudn't come up wid ny othr ex......
it ws adapt nd adept...spelling mistake....
thankz
Everything looks good, but
Everything looks good, but you could have used more concrete exaple in first paragraph, as you did for 2nd para, anyway overall doesn't matter
In 3rd para use of word Adepts appears out of context, adepts is skilful, expert ie an adjective or noun. but the way you used is as verb
I think you could score above 5
Everything looks good, but
Everything looks good, but you could have used more concrete exaple in first paragraph, as you did for 2nd para, anyway overall doesn't matter
In 3rd para use of word Adepts appears out of context, adepts is skilful, expert ie an adjective or noun. but the way you used is as verb
I think you could score above 5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 399 350
No. of Characters: 2030 1500
No. of Different Words: 185 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.469 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.088 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.836 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.346 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.233 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.385 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.331 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.492 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5