125. Some people claim that a nation’s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.
The problem about the conflicts between preservation of wilderness and develop economy is always controversial and complex. For the reason that benefits of wilderness and economic gain are hardly quantified and comparable, some people support the government should preserve wilderness as much as possible to preserve the diversity of nature and some precious creatures, while others argues that economic development has greater significance than wilderness preservation.
At the first place, preservation of some wilderness is necessary to rescue out environment and the nature. On the one hand, there is less and less wilderness in our planet, to some extent; wilderness is another kind of property. Although wilderness cannot foster the increase of GDP directly, it can ameliorate the environment of a certain area, which attracts many elitists and improve the life quality of local residents. This is a chain reaction to prompts the development in several aspects. On the other hand, well-preserved original wilderness can improve the economic by attracting plenty of visitors. For example, there are many national parks in the US such as Yellow Stone National Park and Crater Lake National Park, and the visitors attracted by those national parks significantly prompts the local financial development. If these national parks were not preserved so well, the residents could not have enjoyed economic gain and wonderful scenes simultaneously.
However, preservation of wilderness areas may also stun the development of local economy. Without reclaiming wilderness areas, the government can hardly guarantee the productivity of agriculture. For the countries which depend on the domestic agriculture, the government has to encourage farmers to reclaim wilderness areas to develop agriculture, after all it is not worthy to preserve wilderness at the expanse of high-price import food. Furthermore, the development of industry needs some space to build factories, which means the waste gas and water will be released and they will pollute the wilderness and local environment. There is no government willing to abandon the economic improvement and decide to preserve all wilderness areas.
Another issue should be considered is that the government should find a balance point. For the wilderness areas which are of great beauty or precious animals, it is more beneficial to preserve them rather than reclaim them. However, for wild areas which are of fertile soil or at proper geographic positions, the government can encourage farmers or coorperations to utilize them appropriately. At the balance point, the government can maximize the benefits of wilderness areas.
In conclusion, both advantages and disadvantages coexist about the issue of exploring wilderness areas. The decisions about which wilderness areas should be reclaimed and which are not should be considered in accordance of the specific conditions. The wise and justifiable government can always use this double-edged sword perfectly to improve the life quality of the residents.
- 38 The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued produc 80
- 33 The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company."Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home ap 50
- 125. Some people claim that a nation’s government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain. 80
- 79. Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing view point. Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 50
- 27 The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper."Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' 85
This is a chain reaction to prompts the development
This is a chain reaction to prompt the development
the visitors attracted by those national parks significantly prompts the local financial development
the visitors attracted by those national parks significantly prompt the local financial development
Sentence: The decisions about which wilderness areas should be reclaimed and which are not should be considered in accordance of the specific conditions.
Description: A negator is not usually followed by a modal auxillary
Suggestion: Refer to not and should
Sentence: However, for wild areas which are of fertile soil or at proper geographic positions, the government can encourage farmers or coorperations to utilize them appropriately.
Error: coorperations Suggestion: cooperations
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 461 350
No. of Characters: 2540 1500
No. of Different Words: 219 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.634 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.51 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.017 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 196 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 165 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 125 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 90 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.952 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.459 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.524 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.536 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5