The following is taken from the editorial section of the local newspaper in Rockingham. "In order to save a considerable amount of money, Rockingham's century-old town hall should be torn down and replaced by the larger and more energy-efficient building that some citizens have proposed. The old town hall is too small to comfortably accommodate the number of people who are employed by the town. In addition, it is very costly to heat the old hall in winter and cool it in summer. The new, larger building would be more energy efficient, costing less per square foot to heat and cool than the old hall. Furthermore, it would be possible to rent out some of the space in the new building, thereby generating income for the town of Rockingham. "
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
The author has stated that Rockingham’s old town hall should be torn down and then replaced by a larger and efficient building; proposed by some of the citizens. The author provides certain reasons for the change. Initially, these reasons sound convincing, but as we look deeper into the matter, the reasons consist of many questions to be answered.
Firstly, author provides a reason in terms that the new building would be larger in size than the existing building. But it is no-where mentioned how large would it be than the current hall. The reason must have included the cost of preparation of new building and also the demolition of the existing town hall. It would have been possible that the rehabilitation of current building would cost less. Thus the pecuniary details comparing the preparation of a new structure and repairing the existing one should be included to sound more convincing. The statement that town hall is currently too small to comfortably accommodate the people is contentious itself. The author fails to answer the comfortably in terms of what? The answer to this question remains unanswered.
Furthermore, it is cited that the cost of heating the town hall in winter and cooling it in summer. But it is no-where explained that the new building would be cost effective; rather it is only stated that it would be energy efficient. It would have been possible that the current systems of heating and cooling must have worn out and thus it was costing more. If proper care of these systems was taken care of, say be some maintenance work; it may cost lesser again. The cost contrast between the change of these systems and the construction of new building should have been included. It is not mentioned how long the systems in new building will cost less? All these details are missing which weaken the argument.
The author also includes that some of the space may be possibly rented; which will help to generate income for the town of Rockingham. But it may be possible that no one would be interested for that place due to many reasons viz. it may not be good place for business or may cost a bit more rent. The author also fails to explain that, in what aspects the income generated from these rents will be used for the people?
To make the conclusion that considerable amount of money will be saved; the author fails to answer the questions raised above. Thus, the argument is based on fallacious assumptions which only debilitating the argument further.
- When people move to another country some of them decide to follow the customs of the new country Others prefer to keep their own customs Compare these two choices Which one do you prefer Support your answer with specific details 75
- Facts are stubborn things. They cannot be altered by our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions. 80
- Argument Topic According to a recent report cheating among college and university students is on the rise However Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their 88
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 83
- Issue Topic: The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 93
argument 1 -- this is not a loophole: The statement that town hall is currently too small to comfortably accommodate the people is contentious itself. The author fails to answer the comfortably in terms of what?
argument 2 -- you asked: But it is no-where explained that the new building would be cost effective. actually here is the answer : '...costing less per square foot to heat and cool than the old hall...'
argument 3 -- not exactly
You may read some samples here:
http://www.testbig.com/essays-list?keys=Rockingham&term_node_tid_depth=3
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 428 350
No. of Characters: 2018 1500
No. of Different Words: 178 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.548 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.715 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.501 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.609 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.412 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.5 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5