Space research is gaining it's relevance because of the recent changes in the earth's environment. Humans are the one's should be blamed for the catastrophes like global warming and acid rain. So it is believed that, it would be difficult to survive on the earth after some decades. The world we know might become inhabitable due to the harms which are caused by the humans.As a result some people think that, the authorities should invest more money for the research on other habitable planets. I agree to this statement to a certain extent.
On one hand, it seems to be a more practical solution for every nations to work together to build a home outside our planet. People can shift to that kind of facility, if something worse happens. Lot of researches are going in this subject. For instance, most researchers are concentrating on one planet for this future endeavor, which is none other than the mars. The earth now we know facing serious threats like polar ice melting, this will eventually lead to rise in ocean water levels and floods. Moreover, our planets natural resources like water and vegetation are depleting faster than anything because of the over exploitation and careless usage. We going to be trapped on the earth without the adequate life supporting mechanism if things goes like this.
On the flip side of the coin, some experts still believe that we can reverse what we had done to our planet. But a serious effort is needed both in monitory and social terms. Not only countries but also every individuals should work toward this goal and also governments should give adequate financial support to programs like afforestation. Furthermore authorities should take a lead role to protect the remaining natural flora and fauna. On top of that nations should spend their money on implementing more sustainable practices for it's citizens.
In conclusion, I think researching on other planets as a possible alternative home is not at all a waste of money considering the current situations. But at the same time, regimes should take as much as effort to correct the threatening factors prevailing on the earth. I don't think it is not a good practice to abandon our planet after exploiting everything.
- The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty so rich countries should give other types of help instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- The pie charts compare the percentage of carbohydrates, protein and fat with three different diet programs. 73
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more influence on children's behav 62
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- There are plenty of options available for spreading news, such as newspapers, radio, TV, Internet and so on. According to your opinion what is the best media to use? Why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...ce because of the recent changes in the earths environment. Humans are the ones should...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...he harms which are caused by the humans.As a result some people think that, the au...
^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...support to programs like afforestation. Furthermore authorities should take a lead role to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ning factors prevailing on the earth. I dont think it is not a good practice to aban...
^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our planet after exploiting everything.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95187165775 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70945738341 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569518716578 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8059040847 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298439189718 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800230479087 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456304625794 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174816352131 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601594165041 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.