The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?
There are a considerable number of people who advocate that learning a new language at an early age is thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined to believe that this mentioned trend is mainly beneficial. In this essay, I will support my notion with relevant examples and reasons before reaching to any firm conclusion.
Primarily, from a social point of view, bilinguals are indeed bound to learn more than one languages, which means it might lead to both multi-tasking and decision making. For example, a group of prominent linguists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between children’s cognitive skills and reasoning skills as well as a/the future career prospect. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that multi-learning languages are positively correlated with not only higher self-esteem but also self-confidence and enthusiasm.
In technical terms, being bilingual is undoubtedly attributable to successful employees/managers. With that, it would lead to proficient leaders, and Team workers. A well-known example of such attribution is English, which is cause for concern since it had mistaken in taking it as the global language for granted. Had they done more research in advance, it might have had the opportunity to educate/train offspring’s other productive dialects. Thus, international languages play a pivotal role in developing a feeling of accomplishment and competence towards daunting tasks.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that familiarizing other constructive languages, especially at childhood is of vital importance. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- Mass media like TV, newspaper, and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
- Parents are responsible for their children s behavior To what extent do you agree or disagree 97
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 11
- Recently, mass media has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, "what steps can be taken to tackle this challenge?" Whereas it is a widely held view that media bias is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial asp 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one language', 'a language', or simply 'languages'?
Suggestion: one language; a language; languages
...als are indeed bound to learn more than one languages, which means it might lead to both mult...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74086378738 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48431341171 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664451827243 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.050655945 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154773748149 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537290263644 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644061218533 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804747216528 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441642486679 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.