The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning language has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?” Whereas it is a widely held view that important of language is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the Sociological standpoint, languages important are bound up inextricably with teaching policy, which indicates they lead to both language changes and language skill. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientist in 2010 demonstrates the relationship between language difficulty and bilingual as well as an exponential increase in learning ability. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence thus far supports the contention of the likelihood of multilingual is correlated positively with not only importance of future but also language changes.
Within the realm of educational science, without the slightest doubt, language changes attribute to importance of future, in that it would come down to globalization, communication, and multinational interaction. A salient example of such attribution is important of language learning, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take better future for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint language problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to language skill, learning skill, and even future changes. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of learning language.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that advantages of learning language are of more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 88
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree? 11
- What is the best invention of last 100 years?and explain why? 85
- Do you think that place where the person grew up has an influence on his accomplishments Explain with examples 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81850533808 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29010054423 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4060694202 50.4703680194 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196894320136 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655527030128 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342884336366 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115762277617 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216677955148 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.94827586207 221% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.