In Academic studies, grouping of students according to their academic abilities is good or not? Discuss and give your opinion.
In this competitive era, academic skills play a vital role to make student’s career brighter, although, every student has its own ability to grab the knowledge. However, some people are in favor of grouping the students according to their academic abilities while others are against it. This essay would cast light on both the aspects and my opinion as well.
Elaborating the mindset of those individuals who are in favor of the stated idea that partitioning of students as per their subjective knowledge, will encourage more and more students to work hard to improve their academic performance. Moreover, they will compete in a more desperate manner which can lead fruitful results to them. For instance, kids who do not pay more attention to their studies will eventually start preparing to get in the upgrade group. Thus, they will uproot themselves and give their best in studies.
On the other hand, participation may distract the student’s mindset as they can feel the inferiority complex which can lead them to ignore their studies. This might take away the interest of students from studies. Furthermore, the pupils of the low-grade group can lose their self-confidence for even rest of their life as they can feel separated. So, this can be worst for their future.
Overall, in my opinion, the grouping of students according to their academic abilities should not be done as this can lower down their confidence in themselves and hence, their progress will suffer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20987654321 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77912785359 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2064366037 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.25397266985 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350039257108 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132470296367 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101485130461 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236377825191 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082662788359 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.