“Actions Speak Louder Than Words”. Agree Or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of actions has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question, do they speak louder than words? Where it is held view that accomplishment cannot be achieved without actions, however many hold its opposite view. In this essay the topic will be examined with related reason and examples.
From the Social standpoint, opportunities due to action has provided a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that success as well as self-motivation are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that all revolutionary people in the past have proven the world wrong through their movements. Thus, the secret behind every successful person is great amount of hard work and dedication.
Within the realm of Science, some adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that action don’t always portray the right picture which increase the probability of misconception. Moreover, fundamental aspects of words will define the action, performing action would not be reasonable before being insured for the feasibility and accuracy of the word. As a tangible example, a scientific research by a prestigious university asserted that greatest number of politicians has proven dishonest after defeating. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of actions far outweighs its drawback. Not only allowing one to go ahead into next level but also encouraging to explore in practical zone.
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree? 11
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 88
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 77
- Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Benefits and problems of studying and work related to old theater play in high schools .give your opinion with examples. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...y, the phenomenon of actions has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...ot be achieved without actions, however many hold its opposite view. In this essay the to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...acy of the word. As a tangible example, a scientific research by a prestigious university asserted th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exploring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: exploring
...ad into next level but also encouraging to explore in practical zone.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40148698885 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99921909102 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.706319702602 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9990740645 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0915507223698 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241794543881 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046052968825 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0448530292764 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450924913042 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.