The advanced medical technology expands human's life . Do you think it is a curse or blessing?
Recently, the phenomenon of the advanced medical technology and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is higly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that expanding human’s life can be a plus and I will analye that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, medical treatment can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that scientific improvments, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which are discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications both healthy life styles and improving healthy condition apparently can be seen.
Within the realn of a public arena, producing medical devices might increase the consequences of the increasing life dependancy . As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with developing technology. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of poor sanitation.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benfits of medical outbreaking far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of drugs and healing experiments prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uences of the increasing life dependancy . As a tangible example, some scientific ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87866108787 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34993521911 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694560669456 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6780259998 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.727272727 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141352276816 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452038170662 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490314583115 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743710261723 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462546126845 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.35 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.