The advanced medical technology has a responsibility to human’s life expectancy. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Recently advanced medical technologies have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question " Are these technologies have the responsibilities to human's life expectancy?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that advanced medical technology is highly beneficial. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the medical standpoint, medical technologies are bound up inextricably with human's life expectancy, which indicates they lead to both developments and drugs. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2013 demonstrates the relationship between medicines and surgeries as well as an exponential increase in health records. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of pharmacists is correlated positively with not only doctors but also advanced medical technologies improvements.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, medical devices attribute to modern cures, in that it would come down to radiologists, prototype organs, and illnesses. A salient example of such attribution is heart diseases, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take artificial hearts for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint X-ray pictures problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to antiviral drugs, health workers, and even robotic surgeries. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of medical technologies development in increasing life expectancy.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advanced medical technology is responsible to human's life expectancy. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | neelu sharma | 72 | view |
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
- The advanced medical technology has a responsibility to human’s life expectancy. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 88
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
- Some universities deduct students' work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions? 88
- Some people claim that instead of having to prepare for huge number of exams in schools, children should learn more. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Use your own experience to support your ideas. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ities to humans life expectancy?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that advanced...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...ct to infer the pivotal role of medical technologies development in increasing life expectan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88194444444 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3220875112 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6543633803 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320535494176 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964794254458 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117713580751 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199874685066 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815863502392 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.