Being a journalist is one of the most difficult jobs in the world. To what extent, you agree with it?
Recently, the phenomenon of "being a journalist is one of the most difficult jobs in the world" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that being an international journalist might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that journalism as the most difficult job can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the globalization standpoint, being a journalist as one of the most difficult jobs in the world can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that covering breaking news and being ready for long trips are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the difficulties of war journalism. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both promoting the people's awareness and the ability to write comprehensive essays distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, journalism as one of the most difficult jobs in the world might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of biased news. Moreover, fundamental aspects of different types of journalism can relate to the reality that the demerits of low income of journalists can pertain to the journalists' reputation. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of unskilled journalists were correlated positively with gathering experiences, the local authorities would ultimately address fake news. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of training young journalists.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of being a journalist far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-26 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- A university education is necessary to succeed in a career to what extent to you agree or disagree 88
- There are different assessment systems putting all exams at the end of the term or assignments and exams being spread out throughout the semester What are the advantages and disadvantages of each system Which system do you prefer 85
- Technology allows us to have a helpful and interesting life than in the past Do you agree or disagree 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ble ramifications of both promoting the peoples awareness and the ability to write comp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'journalists'' or 'journalist's'?
Suggestion: journalists'; journalist's
...ncome of journalists can pertain to the journalists reputation. As a tangible example, some...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65771812081 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33341591117 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610738255034 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0052662975 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.272727273 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338050180949 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114351294954 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095512695559 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192073708017 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787117738416 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ble ramifications of both promoting the peoples awareness and the ability to write comp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'journalists'' or 'journalist's'?
Suggestion: journalists'; journalist's
...ncome of journalists can pertain to the journalists reputation. As a tangible example, some...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65771812081 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33341591117 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610738255034 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0052662975 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.272727273 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338050180949 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114351294954 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095512695559 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192073708017 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787117738416 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.