Recently, the phenomenon of working hard to achieve higher in life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that hard work plays a key role in much success, this issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of experts. I am inclined to believe that working for long hour is essential with the improvements of technology, and I will analyze this throughout this essay.
Firstly, inspiration and hard work at life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that higher success rate, as well as happier life in future, are inextricably bound up. For example, when I was a student at university I undertook a research to investigate the likelihood of success rate in hard working communities. I found out that there a positive relationship between success rate and the working hours among the employees. Thus, it is quite evident why such an opinion has garnered support.
Within the realm of technology, striving toward reaching goals is crucial since it can increase the consequences of earning more money. As a tangible example, a scientific research conducted in a prestigious university asserted that the downside of destitution correlates negatively with the working hours among the staff. Hence, it is correct to resume the preconceived notion of hard work in high income communities.
To conclude, while there are many compelling arguments on both sides, the benefits of spending more time at work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages prove the significance of higher income trends but also pinpoint happier life implications.
- Big companies 11
- Big companies 88
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
- Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers. 85
- Green house gas 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...r success rate, as well as happier life in future, are inextricably bound up. For example...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...was a student at university I undertook a research to investigate the likelihood of succes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26966292135 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00274577782 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1058467372 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.