Recently, the phenomenon of over packing and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that colourful packing of products is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that beautiful appearance can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From an economic standpoint, beautiful packing can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that higher sales rate, as well as customer attraction, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of over packing. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both higher sales rate and customer attraction apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of fast-paced technology, over packing the products might increase the consequences of harming the environment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of following customer demands relate to this reality that the demerits of harmful substances pertain to harming the environment. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of overpacking is correlated negatively with an environmental warning. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of environmental effects.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of over packing far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of over packing prove the significance of higher incomes, but also pinpoint environmental friendly implications.
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
- Green house gas 22
- Big companies 11
- Big companies 88
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76078431373 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30620099411 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63137254902 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0587995373 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118568040303 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411215243642 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356335561595 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683729301862 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114527883213 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.