In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon.
<div>Recently, the dominance of credit cards has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question what are the positive and negative consequences?. Whereas it is a widely held view that disappearance of cash is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.</div><div><br></div><div>From the economic standpoint, credit or even debit cards are bound up inextricably with easier transaction of money worldwide, which indicates they lead to both wider circulation of money and simpler business deals. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between banking accounts and hard cash as well as an exponential increase in online backing services. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to customers’ tendency, sales figures, and monetary gains alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of credit cards is correlated positively with not only fewer coins but also fewer notes or bills in the market.</div><div><br></div><div>Within the realm of transactions’ means, without the slightest doubt, e-commerce attribute to financial prosperity, in that it would come down to excellent bargain, financial management, and trades. A salient example of such attribution is local shops, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the virtual money for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint fiscal problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to identity theft, fraudulent cases, and even shortage of change. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of cash or bank cards.</div><div><br></div><div>To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of new credit cards outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-01 | Arashrostamipteacademicmaterials | 55 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | f2faraz | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | bikashkatwal | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-19 | ca hetal | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-01 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 77
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.State your opinion and support it with reasons an 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon. 55
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1993, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1207.87684729 160% => OK
No of words: 323.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99690402477 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.70918899633 2.71678728327 173% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681114551084 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 379.143842365 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.978576778 50.4703680194 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.416666667 104.977214359 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0696328712981 0.242375264174 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0256042541087 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030201328988 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696328712981 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 12.6369458128 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.18 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 55.0591133005 232% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.94827586207 221% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.