Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of cashless market is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that electronic card can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a bank card can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of financial transactions, as well as a secured credit facility, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the faster and safer transactions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both online money and financial conditions apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a plastic card might increase the consequences of being fraud. Moreover, fundamental aspects of online shopping could relate to this reality that the demerits of online transactions pertain to hacking the bank details. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using e-money is correlated negatively with internet hacking. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of using the visa card.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of credit card far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cashless transfers prove the significance of payment methods, but also pinpoint social implications.
- building more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree? 85
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 85
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 11
- experimental learning, traditional learning in high school and university. agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53281853282 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20032738595 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648648648649 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6438741204 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118672952819 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385380131883 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306098262876 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067236243015 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309241483269 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.