Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Do you agree or disagree?.

Essay topics:

Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Do you agree or disagree?.

Of late there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that certain types of music promote learning in person’s life. Some people opine that adopting music as a subject is not a power tool to enhance one’s learning skills. Critics, however, claim that music is a piece of art that brings peaceful mind. I, personally thing that later argument is more realistic and worth to believe.

At the outset there are myriad of argument associated with music coupled with learning process. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that music freshen up our mind and helps to promote our way of thinking. Moreover, it gives pleasure to one’s mind and psychologically relaxes our depress mood. As a prime example, research has conducted on human psychology, which states that involvement of music brings positive change in human’s mind.

On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that music promotes learning in many ways, which includes folk and classic music to learn about tradition and culture in many ways. For instance, great legends in music industry have played tremendous role to potrey cultural stories in the form of lessons in music.

To recapitulate, forgoing discussion propounds that music not only gives peace of mind but also considered as a symbol of love. Thus, that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ciated with music coupled with learning process. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2096069869 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67688795154 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646288209607 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9436717019 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4166666667 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210676333942 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720825070558 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662126043976 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121950684219 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623815153667 0.0609392437508 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.