Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should building more roads to facilitate car owner ship? Agree or disagree?
Recently, expanding city has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Is it better to build more roads or public transport network". Whereas it is a widely held view that improving public transport by a government is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socio-economic standpoint, expanding cities are bound up inextricably with public transport development, which indicates they lead to both the traffic congestion and greenhouse gases. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the air pollution and inadequate private cars as well as an exponential increase in carbon public transit infrastructures. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the free ride is correlated positively with not only governmental policies but also car ownership.
within the realm of the environment, without the slightest doubt, carbon dioxide emissions attribute to overcrowded roads, in that it would come down to environmentally-friendly policies, restriction car ownership, and clean air. A salient example of such attribution is the climate change, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take building roads for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint ecosystems problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the better public transport network in people's health.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that better public transportation in more important for the city rather than building roads. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-01 | Mani.Narimani | 77 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | Mani.Narimani | 77 | view |
- As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for menand women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? Whatare the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support yourp 79
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. 85
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should building more roads to facilitate car owner ship? Agree or disagree? 77
- With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value for artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area? 85
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...l policies but also ownership cars. within the realm of environment, without the s...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analayzing what elaborated above...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tant for city rather than building roads . However, with the benefit of hindsight,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75352112676 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36589086259 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69014084507 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7873162513 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.545454545 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22552671249 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731851640536 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598175848493 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128772935615 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459861524242 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.