City are now expanding, the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree?

In today's world, the importance of improving public transportation due to expansion of cities, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. Some people claim that efficient public transport is a better choice. However, opponents suggested that more efforts should be taken towards building new roads for private vehicles. In my opinion, I strongly believe that, making better network for public transport is more important for welfare of people also it can reduce traffic, air pollution and more safer.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why government should invest in improving public transport. But the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that a public transportation such as buses, trains, trams and ferries are used by people more frequently and majority of people living in cities prefer public transport over private cars. Not only this will reduce problems such as traffic and pollution, but will also make environment more clean. For instance, international studies have shown repeatedly that countries which have better public transport have less traffic and less pollution which is vital for healthy life.

Another justification for upholding this notion is that more roads will results in more vehicles and this can increase in road accidents. Besides, private vehicles are more expensive to maintain and any carelessness can results in serious injuries for drivers and other people on roads, moreover public transport is safer as compare to private vehicles during night jobs or early hours. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of public transportation.
In view of my arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the significance public transport are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 510, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
...t can reduce traffic, air pollution and more safer. At the outset, there are numerous re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ing this notion is that more roads will results in more vehicles and this can increase ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ads, moreover public transport is safer as compare to private vehicles during nigh...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39338235294 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75628165464 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6049433254 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336855216807 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122867223796 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576060748074 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190330079978 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102494445472 0.0609392437508 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.