Company Top Level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to make any decisions. Discuss both views.
Using new innovative ideas has become a controversial issue among all firm’s holders if they prefer to remain in this competitive markets. Whilst some people think it is authorities’ responsibility to use their own idea in a company, I, along with others, am profoundly inclined to believe that, sometimes employees’ idea could lead to success. Both sides will be analyzed by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, there are plenty reasons why I say higher authorities should have considered the idea of employees. Firstly, it is suggested by experts that most of the people working in the specific area, knows everything about the ins and outs of that process. Secondly, according to many essential logical valid, while a company pays tuition fees for their staff’s courses, they became a valuable asset for that corporation. Besides, using employees’ idea could lead to saving money due to decrease outsourcing process. From my own experience, brainstorming meeting usually lead to inventing new products in many innovative pioneer companies. Furthermore, it could lead to creating a positive working atmosphere and increase the loyalty rate among all workers.
On the other hand, opponents’ view is that using everyone’s idea in the organization, except management team, may have severe impacts. They assert that employees may give any advice in which they have their personal benefit. According to an academic research conducted by Tehran University, using employees’ idea may lead to chaos without supervision. However, using a selected supervisory team, it could have reversal effects.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, using employees’ idea not only could lead to flourishing for that organization, but also brings creativity and innovation. The top-level management team should be smart enough to judge the plausibility implementation, as the final decision should be taken by them.
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage What problems will it cause? 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 80
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 80
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
Using new innovative ideas has become a controversial issue ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64214046823 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31210077158 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638795986622 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8977560425 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.466666667 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176190196004 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561489183994 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520607288553 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112226385379 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414677072242 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.