Discuss advantages and disadvantages of the Television and give your opinion.
In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge to see discussion on the role of the TV in this fast-pace era, be it affluent nations or impoverished nations. The role of the TV has become a double-edged swords: on the one hand, this advance technology enables people to be aware by news and attain knowledge in array of fields; on the other hand, the TV has become a merely instrument of the entertainment and it is the main reason for the sheer waste of time in cut-throat competition. As such, there are both the merits and demerits to the trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
There are myriad of ways by which one can augment his knowledge in all the fields by TV. The most conspicuous one is that the advent technology in TV allows to browse all the wide variety of channels and can be aware of the latest news. Not only does TV promise gain in knowledge and broaden the individual's horizon, but also it can proved instrumental in terms of entertainment after a busy schedule during the whole day. Hence, it is empirically true that the proliferation of the TV empowers the human being.
However, another pivotal facet of the argument is that people indulge too much in watching the TV and waste their precious time. Besides, they create an unwelcome gap between the family members due to hindrance in the communication; for example, after a busy day for companion if you neglect and start the entertaining programmes it can have severe negative impact on the relationship. Therefore, it hardly needs to mention that these drawback will keep individual in low-level position.
In view of the arguments, one can conclude that associated advantages are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'sword'?
Suggestion: sword
...ole of the TV has become a double-edged swords: on the one hand, this advance technolo...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('merely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('instrument') instead of another adjective.
...s; on the other hand, the TV has become a merely instrument of the entertainment and it is the main...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'browsing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: browsing
...that the advent technology in TV allows to browse all the wide variety of channels and ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...omise gain in knowledge and broaden the individuals horizon, but also it can proved instrum...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'prove'
Suggestion: prove
...he individuals horizon, but also it can proved instrumental in terms of entertainment ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this drawback' or 'these drawbacks'?
Suggestion: this drawback; these drawbacks
...refore, it hardly needs to mention that these drawback will keep individual in low-level posit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7937947113 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.381336346 50.4703680194 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0353468932636 0.242375264174 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154451645463 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254494947435 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0268482157955 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273717212665 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.