Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example.
Nowadays, the extra packaging of products has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, Which leads to a moot question “whether the producer is responsible for over packaging or the customer?”. It is a widely held view that the producers are blamed for over-packaging, whereas I tend to believe that both consumers and the producers must avoid extra packaging of products.
To begin with, it is a common belief that over-packaging the products play a vital role in the world of business. To put into consideration, I express several reasons. First and foremost is that the durability of products will be increased as well they are less likely exposed to detrimental rays or contamination of the environment. Secondly, it can be argued that an extensive range of people are attracted by amazing packaging and the companies will be able to raise their sells, revenue, and income capacity. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that a wide variety of companies use this strategy to appeal their potential buyers to introduce the products.
However, over-packaging provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that extra packaging makes the water and natural environment polluted. Moreover, it is quite clear that the majority of packages are more likely flashy and tricky in order to tempt customers to purchase the products without knowing them. A very tangible example to illustrate would be India that people are suffering from over-packaging wastes.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that over packaging in order must be avoided by both the producer and potential customers. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | greatrin | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Sidra018 | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | ajayvermaETP | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | lalacamargo1 | 77 | view |
- The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems on our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issu 78
- The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to developed countries. This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in developed countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not. What are the reasons for that? 11
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example. 77
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... extra packaging of products has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09870376475 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8006214215 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.384615385 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265742999455 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888667523941 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752524550104 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160258157238 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852091271764 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.