Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of product packaging has sparked an on going controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, whose responsibility it is avoid over packed goods? where it is held view that buyer should avoid it, however many hold its opposite view that it is producers job to reduce extra beautification. In this essay both sides of the argument will be examined with related reasons and example.
From the social standpoint, attractive product can offer the society with some noticeable effect which are rooted in the fact that the merits of quality consumption, as well as pleasant experience are inevitably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the positive relationship between consumer views and well-packaged products. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this remarkable phenomenon and complicated rules apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, over packed product might increase the consequence of critical need. Moreover fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of over beautified goods might pertain to health problem, environment pollution, overrated products, increasing manufacturing cost etc which at the end resulting in unhealthy environment. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative process correlate negatively with societies well-being. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of over packed product far outweighs its benefits. Not only it attract people to buy but also leave great unhealthy foot prints.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | greatrin | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Sidra018 | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | ajayvermaETP | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | lalacamargo1 | 77 | view |
- Positive and negative effects of today’s communication. 11
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one career. To what extent do you agree ? 85
- Technological innovation has affected our lives.do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 88
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...non of product packaging has sparked an on going controversy, which inevitably leads to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'avoided'.
Suggestion: avoided
...ot question, whose responsibility it is avoid over packed goods? where it is held vie...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...sibility it is avoid over packed goods? where it is held view that buyer should avoid...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...iew that buyer should avoid it, however many hold its opposite view that it is producers ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...rease the consequence of critical need. Moreover fundamental aspects of the faulty syste...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attracts'?
Suggestion: attracts
...far outweighs its benefits. Not only it attract people to buy but also leave great unhe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67753623188 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10565161257 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68115942029 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8542772166 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209564946212 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661942968347 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652815648159 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119952572115 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751119842631 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.