Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?
Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
It has become popular that manufacturers produce products that are packed with extra packaging for convenience and for boosting the sale figures. Although consumers can choose products with less packaging, in my opinion, it should be manufacturers’ obligation to avoid applying extra packaging for their products because of the reasons below.
First of all, consumers often have limited choices in choosing unpacked products. What this means is that in modern society where most of the people are busy at work, workers with extended working hours often do not have time to purchase products from places where unpacked products are available. Take Hong Kong as example. Most workers have to buy vegetables with packaging from supermarkets because wet markets are usually closed at the time when workers are off duty.
Another reason why I believe the manufacturer should avoid extra packaging is that the packaging is often made with plastic; it is toxic and is not biodegradable. Overly applying such packaging can be detrimental to both human beings and the environment. In fact, it has been scientifically proven that it takes over 100 years for the plastic to be degraded by the environment. Using less packaging can largely help reduce the pollution on the environment and thus can improve human’s health.
In conclusion, I believe that it is the manufacturers’ responsibility to apply less packaging in order to protect the environment.
- The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006. 78
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 67
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with?Give reasons for your answer and include any re 84
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values).Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 61
- The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in order to protect the environment.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38961038961 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12340587327 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0824968811 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.181818182 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238725037098 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852421288128 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765915006615 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137329647723 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818539692739 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.