Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products?
Nowadays, the un-standard packaging of foods has become one of major issues of enviroment pollution through human produced garbage. Manufacturers and also citizens are encouraged to control the packaging procedure to avoid giving extra plastic and other none-degradable products out into the natural environment. I overally subscribe to the idea that the control should be mostly in the production line rather than houses as this is state demand and part of environment rules which should be imposed from high to bottom that is from government to NGOs and then general public.
Based on international convention protecting the environment is now duty of states and they are expected to allocate enough budget to encourage, control and limit the overpackaging in all industries, therefore this is in the first place duty of a government to handle the plannings to avoid the issue which mean they have to escelate to all producers to follow, as one solution was mentioned on a paper they have to increase the tax on those products which has harmful packaging.
On the other hand, it is not fair to expect the general public to always act very successful in keeping away of overpacked goods as this might be a plight to their normal daily life and needs. In the other words the normal people in sociery may suffer deprivation of their need for example to avoid buy groceries becauase of the overpackaging.
To conclude, Overpackaing is indeed harmful to our ecosystmes and everyone should take the responsibiliy; However in my believe because of agreed rules all over the world or at least in the country I live, this movement should source from governments and susecquently producer and cititzens at the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | sivaprasadraj | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-29 | Arash3agle | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-29 | Arash3agle | 77 | view |
| 2017-11-02 | enaslam | 72 | view |
| 2017-10-25 | enaslam | 72 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 80
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 562, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hat is from government to NGOs and then general public. Based on international convention p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ther hand, it is not fair to expect the general public to always act very successful in keepin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...d take the responsibiliy; However in my believe because of agreed rules all over the wo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, at least, for example, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08480565371 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9144896889 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.5024630542 195% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.699670217 50.4703680194 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 205.571428571 104.977214359 196% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.4285714286 20.9669160288 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 7.25397266985 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207791430649 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864900601997 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613910392804 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107814649235 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765568709472 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 12.6369458128 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.88 53.1260098522 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.9458128079 173% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.3980295567 173% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 10.5123152709 219% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.