Do you think the school should have a curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago?
Recently the phenomenon of professional curriculum and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of thinking skills is highly beneficial, such issue thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that primary school can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, playing drama can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">school </span>problems, as well as smart student, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed academic research which discovered intellectual students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">school </span>policies and <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">school </span>requirements apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, school studies might increase the consequences of childhood play. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of playing music relate to this reality that the demerits of hard-working pertain to work management. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of smart thinking is correlated negatively with thinking issues. Hence, it's correct to presume the preconceived notion of public school.
To conclude while there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of smart thinking far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of student assignment prove the significance of old theater, but also pinpoint successful play implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15261044177 5.00649968141 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.12421838308 2.71678728327 152% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658634538153 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7679652102 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.846153846 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187922479204 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607735406563 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473618510227 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109182182297 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434759282709 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.39 11.5310837438 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.