Does video communication with doctors help patients to cure any disease. Pros and cons
In this technical era everything is developing day by days. The scientists are making new-new things time by time in previous time there were mobiles not available. On that time only telephones are available. But now mobiles are available. Moreover video calls are available. Video communications with doctor help patients to cure any disease. With this statement I will discuss its pros and cons.
Firstly, video calling is booming now day’s people do video call with their family member but know they people are doing video communication with doctors if they have any critical condition at home and they think that people can cure patient from any small disease. Moreover video calling with doctor also help in emergency like heart pain or any heart decease patient’s family member can handle it carefully in the guardians of doctor. For example in USA 30% of heart patient get relief from pain at home and save their life with the help of doctor. After that patient get proper advice from reputed hospital’s doctor with this technology and get prescription from them.
Secondly, video calling with doctor is better thing but sometimes it becomes a disadvantage. Because the camera from which patient are showing their disease sometime it visual is not good that doctor can see properly. Moreover in our world some places is that available in which internet is not available that patient can’t do video call. After that other thing is that miss- understanding of symptoms, while curing certain disease.
To conclude, I think that video calling is not good. So patient should go to the doctor’s reference.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | Vanshdeep singh | 55 | view |
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cur any disease.Pros and cons. 55
- Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may have devastating effects on animals & human life. 72
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phone. do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 55
- Companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don't need. Give your opinion about this practice. 55
- Is it better for college students to live for away from home than live to at home with their parents? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ailable. But now mobiles are available. Moreover video calls are available. Video commun...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...video call with their family member but know they people are doing video communicati...
^^^^
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...an cure patient from any small disease. Moreover video calling with doctor also help in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ut sometimes it becomes a disadvantage. Because the camera from which patient are showi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... not good that doctor can see properly. Moreover in our world some places is that availa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld go to the doctor's reference.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16165413534 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67324956082 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541353383459 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.4880433172 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7647058824 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41368455205 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1404879914 0.0925447433944 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177819328697 0.071462118173 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239477771382 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780484242874 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.