As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of online E-book diminished the value of printed books and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that electronic books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, diminishing printed books can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the printed books, as well as online discussions, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the public arena, e-book publishers might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of bookstore websites could relate to this reality that the demerits of printed books pertain to digital format. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of digital online books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only, do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcome, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of online E-book diminished the value of printed b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75094339623 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17480738351 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.106940167 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216235175735 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075035672783 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925973085442 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127317129077 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514843864386 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.