Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon of effective learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of requiring time and peace are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that combining study and employment can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, effective learning can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of hard-working students, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient
studying. Hence, beneficial ramifications of acceptable employment are crucial.
From a scientific point of view, combining study and employment can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient studying are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described detrimental distractions. Thus, predicted outcomes of requiring time and comfort are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of effective learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of combining study and employment prove the significance of required time and peace, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Studying
...iscovered the importance of efficient studying. Hence, beneficial ramifications of acc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27126207381 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8693797647 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.454545455 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257382988777 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08254698887 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625234808222 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119965748206 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576310197703 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.