With enough amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of motivation and practice and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that motivation and practice can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial validity of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, motivation and practice can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, motivation and practice might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of motivation and practice far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-07 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | dhavalpatel095 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
- The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 85
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 85
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87072243346 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35437943337 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631178707224 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4238894017 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10214747717 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349352907512 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256785294831 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600660941002 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00824288879671 0.0609392437508 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.