Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university Which one do you agree is more effective

Essay topics:

Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books. Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university, Which one do you agree is more effective?

One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that to teach others, have study many books many as you can. There is a white spread of worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
there are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that the experience of doing many types of research at high school and the university gives much more knowledge than reading textbooks and there are numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but it can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficiency, and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.

Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication, and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of getting experience in experimental and traditional learning in high school and university.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of getting experience in experimental and traditional learning in high school and university are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... and I will explain why in this essay. there are a number of arguments in favor of m...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93430656934 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85637515089 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551094890511 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.19234187 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268541204352 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908248991794 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085373544828 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162663961935 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564594800191 0.0609392437508 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.