In recent years, people make the choice to buy food from local food producers. It is often said that it would foster the national economy and be better for the environment. While there still have some drawbacks, I would argue that this is outweighed by enormous advantages.
There are two main reasons why some people do not choose locally grown food. First, local products are limited in certain types of food due to small scale agriculture, so that they must travel to other places to buy others. Second, everything in the farms is made by manual labour than mechanical engineers. Moreover, the transportation and distribution cost might be higher than in the large agricultural business. Therefore, farmers are likely to charge consumers higher prices.
In spite of the drawbacks mentioned above, I believe that people ate food from local farmers will contribute to the development of the economy and environment preservation. The more locally-grown food has been used, the more jobs have been created for the locals. Your choice will help millions of farmers improving their quality of life. When it comes to the environment, due to small scale farms, farmers would use fewer pesticides that result in a reduction in land pollution. For the high-quality demand of buyers, they use organic fertilisers utilising the source from livestock, waste both agricultural and waste produced in farms such as leaves and branches. You can see many locally grown products such as fruits, vegetables attached name “preservative-free” as well.
In conclusion, it seems to me that we gain more than lose from enhancing consumption more and more food produced from local farmers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly to charge consumers higher prices. In spite of the drawbacks mentioned abov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20740740741 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96739483365 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8481984671 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7333333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320378944426 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953140268315 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825474970172 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190807664914 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632648806684 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.