Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems

Lower literacy rates have still existed in the developing world. This trend has devastating effects on populations everywhere. To address this issue, financial support and increasing the study opportunity for people who are not able to read and write are prior steps. This essay will examine the major effects and measures for this problem.
Firstly, the major effects of this are entirely negative. It is clear that people who cannot read and write could not enter into higher education, which deprives them of getting a decent job in the future. This leads to constraining the national development in terms of economy. Furthermore, illiterate people are likely to be cheated and manipulated. For example, in rural areas in Vietnam, hundreds of people have lost their properties as they trust in the fraud without reading official documents while transacting. Thus, as makes clear, these effects need to be countered to develop societies.
To tackle this problem, the government could subsidize the tutor fees for children, who do not have a chance to go to school or drop out of school due to poverty. As evidenced in the northern mountainous areas in Vietnam, the government annually spends a large amount of money from the national budget aiding local education, gradually alleviating the illiteracy there. Apart from caring for the future generation, supplementary classes have been opened to support illiterate adults, thereby helping them get to know words and other kinds of stuff. Thus, encouraging children to go to school via financial support and improving the ability of reading and writing of adults will be foremost measures of this problem.
Following this look, unfortunate trends in the developing world would make society become less thriving. It is hoped that in the near future these nations could decrease the illiteracy rate to a minimum percentage by these initiatives mentioned above.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, look, so, still, thus, while, apart from, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27868852459 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73625366462 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596721311475 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7509214657 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209206847687 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657842840739 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540858824394 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123544722132 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401070637538 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.