Global problems are related to governments and international organizations. What are the problems and what is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "global problems are related to governments and international organizations" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the influence of global problems might remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the role of international organizations can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the climate standpoint, global problems relating to governments and international organizations can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that environment preservation and the responsibilities of governments are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered some global problems such as air pollution. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both rising sea levels and melting icebergs distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, global problems relating to governments and international organizations such as climate change might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of supplying food resources. Moreover, fundamental aspects of global hunger can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of agricultural products can pertain to the government's budgets. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of greenhouse gas emissions were correlated positively with spending producing fuel-efficient cars, the local authorities would ultimately address sound the pollution of big cities. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of promoting life quality.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the role of governments and international organizations about global problems far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-16 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-29 | sattar_iust | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | jaideep singh | 69 | view |
- Media make people lose contact with real life do you agree or disagree 88
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Support with examples or cases 88
- If Voting is compulsory in democratic society what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy 88
- You are given climate as the field of study Which area would you prefer Explain why you picked this up the particular area of your study 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1207.87684729 150% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07692307692 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54361044355 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612040133779 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 379.143842365 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6061571125 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.181818182 104.977214359 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32540111647 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115929816707 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919124110241 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206666981951 0.151781067708 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213759282568 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 12.6369458128 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 53.1260098522 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.28 11.5310837438 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.