The government should create a better public transport network, rather than building more roads for car owned by individuals. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of creating a better public transport network by the government or car owned individuals and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive or consequently by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that building more road for car owned individuals create a better public transport can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, comparing a better public transport network created by individuals and the government can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issue, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered the current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, individuals or the government building more roads might increase the consequence of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is important to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a public transport network owned by individuals far outweigh, not only due to the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issue’s potential implications.
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to Society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To What extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- More and more students are studying at universities abroad, either because it is cheaper, or because they feel they can receive a better education, or because it will provide them with greater professional opportunities. Which one do you think is the most 84
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 88
- Should schools provide organized activities for children after lessons end? 85
- Should schools provide organized activities for children after lessons end? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73800738007 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27257387864 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.180909085 50.4703680194 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316776112192 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114529117344 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101636761638 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176781642849 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951692284796 0.0609392437508 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 12.6369458128 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.