Has polygamy increased widely in this modern and brutal life? How far do you agree with this statement?

Essay topics:

Has polygamy increased widely in this modern and brutal life? How far do you agree with this statement?

Recently, the increasing of the polygamy in modern life has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "has polygamy increased widely in modern life?". Whereas it is a widely held view that increasing of the polygamy is beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.

From the society standpoint, social norms are bound up inextricably with standards of behavior, which indicates they lead to both family bonding and polygamy. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between polygamist societies and family income as well as an exponential increase in marriage problems. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of loyalty is correlated positively with not only partner but also social laws.

Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, modern life attribute to stressful lifestyle, in that it would come down to anxiety, depression, and family expenditure. A salient example of such attribution is diverse, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take monogamy for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint soliloquy problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to x, x, and even x. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education, awareness, and economy condition.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-19 simin2019 79 view
2019-12-23 Prabu 77 view
2019-12-03 venkatesh1018 80 view
2019-12-03 venkatesh1018 72 view
2019-11-13 shyamsingh08 11 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user yasamin.gharib62 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the society standpoint, social norm...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...only partner but also social laws. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72103004292 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14885774945 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68669527897 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1506083417 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203095116746 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563612723964 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081871150698 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134572506314 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127179982475 0.0609392437508 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.