Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statement? Use your own examples to support.

One of the most conspicuous trend of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that hosting sporting events can tremendously benefits to the host nations. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.

There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that hosting sporting events can not only contribute to the benefits of the host countries but leads to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. For example, in my country people motives to the players, which encourage them and has benefited to the country. Needless to say that, all these merits stand one in good stead as far as augmenting the chances of excellence is concerned.

Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned trend is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varies areas. Besides, only when one follow such as system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes to responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of hosting events.

In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the potential benefits of hosting game events are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93560606061 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77526947128 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3975170244 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.583333333 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239993969428 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840231374579 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764853189655 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148927331156 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476747908855 0.0609392437508 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.