How do you think the crime would reduce – with harsher punishments or moral teachings? Discuss both the views and take a stand?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in number of criminal which should be favour by teaching and guiding in right direction. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and should be rejected.
There are number of argument in favour of my stance but the most preponderant want is that human is kind being, mistake can be happened it doesn't mean that we should draw a conclusion that human is evil and should be punished. In fact, Not only people should given chance to know what they have done but also to improve and realise their mistake so in future they will aware of this situation. We can find overwhelming evidence that punishment will only create negative vibe on human being which can affect their living. Needless to say, all these merits stand criminal in a good stead as far as realising is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that punishment doesn't help to teach people about their wrong doing but they might learns as a practice that when people do wrong thing we punished them. Beside,all these ideas and arguments we need to be even more conscious that children catch things easily so this kind of bad teaching should be avoided in front of them. For example, we can give them explanation about what they have done wrong and what should they have to do in order to make situation better. Hence, it is apparent why many are in my favour of moral teaching practice to reduce crime.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of moral teaching are indeed too great to ignore.
- Is Toursim Good Or Bad For The Countries? Agree Or Disagree 11
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 72
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, water river rafting etc. Do you support? if yes why and if not why not? 65
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education is to make people ready for employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'favoured'?
Suggestion: favoured
...e in number of criminal which should be favour by teaching and guiding in right direct...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... kind being, mistake can be happened it doesnt mean that we should draw a conclusion t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
...nished. In fact, Not only people should given chance to know what they have done but ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd overwhelming evidence that punishment will only create negative vibe on human ...
^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pect of this argument is that punishment doesnt help to teach people about their ...
^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ct of this argument is that punishment doesnt help to teach people about their wrong ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , all
... do wrong thing we punished them. Beside,all these ideas and arguments we need to be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, for example, in fact, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 6.10837438424 278% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67235494881 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41475234746 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535836177474 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5936929447 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.083333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107424150124 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453113222477 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544871876781 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707019368673 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496502443982 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.1260098522 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.