How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life/family/leisure and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?
Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time on work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of having fun with family is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the importance of personal life can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, family satisfaction can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of job opportunities, as well as family gatherings, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a friendly office environment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both individual achievements and career improvement apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, work addiction might increase the consequences of family problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of social issues would relate to this reality that the demerits of standard offices pertain to hard-working employees. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of personal problems is correlated negatively with earning money. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of meeting friends.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of spending time with friends far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of experiencing time shortage prove the significance of working on weekends, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- It is important for children to study cultural courses like film/movie/video gaming at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example. 85
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children's acts. What is your opinion? 85
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life/family/leisure and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65267175573 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26355519252 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667938931298 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7249411704 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195592211969 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592296718828 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528996436036 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105670261687 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479441891772 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.