The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Do you Agree or Disagree?
The advancement of the contemporary era has literally changed the definition of literacy. With rapid changes in technology, it has become necessary to adapt new skills and dump the obsolete. It is agreed that to stay relevant to the constantly changing environment one must not only know how to read and write but also need to know how to learn, unlearn, and relearn. This essay will discuss compelling reasons to accord with the rubric.
To start with, today inventions are changing the way we do things. For example, computers operating system started with pentium & recently its 10th upgrade was released which is known as ‘Windows 10. Those who learnt to use pentium 2 & 3 must unlearn that and relearn new windows to stay afloat in a Sea of changes. This exemplifies that latter is more important than the former.
Moreover, to stay relevant to next coming generation, it has become essential to continuously keep learning. For instance, for many youngsters, it has become common to keep in touch with their friends and extended families through social media. Those who do not learn to use it may get literally disconnected from this newly literate generation of learners and re-learners. This example clearly shows that to be known as a literate in this century one must repeatedly update their learning process.
This analysis proves that to be relevant to this era of regular inventions, embracing the change is the mantra of life. In a nutshell, those open to learn, unlearn and relearn will be the new literates. It is expected to remain like that in upcoming decades.
- The governement should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 73
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discusss both views and give you own opinion 95
- Some people think that children should learn to paint or draw at school. Others believe it is just a waste of time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and example 96
- Consumers are faced with an increasing amount of advertising from competing companies. To what extent are the consumers influenced by advertisements? What measure can protect the consumers? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00377358491 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75419211603 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592452830189 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.6157635468 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7063704294 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 2.91625615764 274% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204121888884 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631649492526 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867474610995 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121714676341 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261881023076 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 60.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.