With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. University should only produce digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view.
The importance of the increase of digital media available online, which is always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of the online-based library has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the society in recent years. It can be agreed that digital media provides number of merits, but it has some drawbacks. This essay will elaborate both advantage and disadvantage of the electric textbooks and lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the university should be encouraged to use digital media in their library, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that online textbooks do not need to use tremendous paper for updating from time to time. For example, millions of paper are used to publish a recent version of a book in the real, which a lot of trees are spent for it. Therefore, E-books can play vital roles in updating books.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of online library, but the most notable one is rooted from the fact that it is not too much to say the importance of the library and its values are still important. For instance, many people still go to the library to find and read a book, even if they can access to the book throughout the technological devices. Thus, the library can not be obsolete and should be kept in the university.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impacts of the digitalized books are prominent, although it has some drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | Seonmi Lee | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93632958801 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7785971382 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546816479401 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8010106778 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205501049584 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815485939309 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669702941461 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124813003796 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898848684044 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.