With increase population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty? How can this be solved?
With increase in population and enormous development for urban cities may affect the beauty spots of different countries. Some people believe that over population and emerging of urban cities cause diminish of beauty spots and other people argue that there is no benefit to preserve the beauty spots. In this essay, I shall discuss about influences of over population on beautiful place inside cities and explore the solution to this argument.
To start with, recently there is significance increase population of different countries in this world. People need residence to live and other facilities for general purpose. Some beautiful spots like parks, monuments and other important jungles areas are developed in urban cities. For example mountains are cutting down for roads and urban cities. By developing cities, it has influenced and cause many problems. Naturally beauty of cities are diminishing from the cities.
On the other side, preserving these spots provide a pleasant environment in this world. In addition, these spots provide ambiance over the cities and allure the tourists. Preserving beautiful spaces always provide revenue in terms of finance as revenue and fresh air. To accommodate more population building skyscrapers are best way to resolve this problem. By local regime, people can build multistory buildings which will save spaces and cause the air flow.
In recapitulate, there are myriad and multifarious views for this argument. People should save this earth and preserve the earth's environment for betterment for next generation. Local regime must organize the campaign to give awareness of current problems.
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers ? 85
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 65
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 80
- Mass media like TV, newspaper, and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 85
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, white-water river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities are diminishing from the cities. On the other side, preserving these spot...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
...te more population building skyscrapers are best way to resolve this problem. By local r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll save spaces and cause the air flow. In recapitulate, there are myriad and mu...
^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...should save this earth and preserve the earths environment for betterment for next gen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, for example, in addition, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49407114625 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6636386804 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557312252964 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3914047177 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.7647058824 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8823529412 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 7.25397266985 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232045082103 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744514705013 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686830923808 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13526811623 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909553953727 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.